Regulator asks for midwife to be struck off over failings in care before newborn’s death

Pippa Griffiths remaining held by her mum, Kayleigh and sister, Brooke with father, Colin

The Nursing & Midwifery Council has been holding a hearing to decide on a sequence of failings in the treatment offered by two Shropshire midwives – Claire Roberts and Joanna Youthful.

Both of those had been involved in the care of 1-day-outdated little one, Pippa Griffiths, who died on April 27, 2016, from a Team B strep an infection – the most typical induce of meningitis in newborns.

Pippa’s mother, Kayleigh, had offered start at the family household in Myddle, close to Shrewsbury, and had spoken with the midwives to increase fears that her daughter was not feeding and experienced brought up brown mucus.

The two midwives labored for Shrewsbury & Telford Medical center NHS Have confidence in (SaTH) at the time.

Immediately after Pippa stopped respiratory on her mother’s lap, she was flown to Princess Royal Hospital in Telford by air ambulance, wherever she was verified lifeless.

The costs considered by the NMC linked to two separate discussions the midwives had with Mrs Griffiths on April 27.

Both equally had been located to have unsuccessful to recognise the urgency of a need for healthcare or midwifery focus for Pippa.

In the scenario of Ms Roberts the panel identified she had effectively tried using to cover up around her steps during a 2am call with Mrs Griffiths.

The hottest phase of the listening to saw panel chair, David Evans, conclude that Roberts’ steps had amounted to misconduct, serious in some instances, and that her conditioning to practise is impaired.

NMC solicitor Julian Norman claimed in mild of the results she requested that Roberts – who has not engaged with the procedure or attended any hearings – is struck off.

Mr Evans mentioned the “only feasible clarification” in excess of her steps above the inaccurate history of a conversation with Mrs Griffiths experienced been to “safeguard yourself from disciplinary action”.

He additional: “This motion would be regarded as deplorable by fellow practitioners.”

The panel will reconvene on Thursday to announce its sanction on Roberts.

In the scenario of Ms Young the panel concluded her steps had also amounted to misconduct, and in some conditions really serious misconduct, but ended up satisfied in the efforts she has taken to handle the failings.

The panel reported it thought Ms Youthful experienced demonstrated “major regret and designed perception” into her involvement in the scenario.

Simply because her health and fitness to practise is not regarded impaired she faces no sanction.

Mr Evans reported: “The panel is mindful that in the 6 yrs due to the fact you have labored for a appreciable time as a health and fitness customer and and no even further worry has been acquired.”

He additional that Ms Young experienced concluded “considerable instruction” which experienced “targeted on clinical parts of issue which arose from the incident in 2016”.

Mr Evans claimed: “Although your physical fitness to practise may have been impaired at the time supplied all of the above your exercise to practise is not at the moment impaired.”

The hearing will continue on on Thursday.

Previous post Dos and Don’ts of Helping Out a Friend in Need
Next post 15 Must-Have Baby Products and Factors to Consider Before Purchase